Category: All Posts Page 22 of 153

Tear-feeding by Cockroaches: Reptile Tears to Increase Reproductive Output?

Cockroach positioned on head of Anolis fuscoauratus, on 29 March 2019 in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Photo by Javier Aznar González de Rueda

New literature alert!

Lachryphagy by cockroaches: reptile tears to increase reproductive output?

In Neotropical Biodiversity

van den Burg & Aznar González de Rueda

 

Abstract

Lachryphagy, or tear-feeding, is generally considered as supplementary feeding by invertebrates with a long proboscis to acquire essential nutrients. Commonly reported vertebrate host species of lachrypaghic interactions are humans and birds, and in reptiles concern large species: turtles and crocodiles, with one report from an iguanid host. Here, we report tear-feeding by a cockroach, a species lacking a proboscis, on a small squamate species, Anolis fuscoauratus. We address how the nutritional needs for the reproductive cycle may force cockroaches to explore any dietary source with essential nutrients. In addition to birds, our report adds Anolis as invertebrate predators that are visited by lachryphagous invertebrates, interactions that may be restricted to nights to reduce predation risk for the feeding invertebrates. This report extends tear-feeding behavior to proboscis-lacking invertebrates, and to small squamate hosts, and demonstrates that lachryphagy on reptilian hosts is not restricted to diurnal occurrence. Overall, this observation suggests that similar interactions could be far more frequent.

Read the full paper here!

Owl Eats Anole!

Turns out that it happens more commonly than you might think! Here’s the latest report from The Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society, a ferruginous pygmy-owl eating a clouded anole in Mexico.

NSF Grant to Study Niche Use in Anoles

SCIENTIST STUDIES ANOLE LIZARDS TO HELP CONSERVE VULNERABLE SPECIES
National Science Foundation funds UTA biologist’s investigation of islands’ reptile diversity

MONDAY, JUL 26, 2021 • LINSEY RETCOFSKY : CONTACT

 

Anole lizard

 

A biologist at The University of Texas at Arlington is studying the diversity of anole lizard species in the Caribbean islands to gain insight into why some species are common, while others are rare and possibly at risk for extinction.

The National Science Foundation awarded Luke Frishkoff, assistant professor of biology, a $1.1 million grant to investigate the reptile’s ecological niches, the set of conditions in which an organism can survive and reproduce.

Anoles with a broad niche thrive in a range of ecological conditions; those with a narrow niche are specialized to live in environments that meet their precise biological needs. Knowing the lizards’ niche characteristics will help scientists identify which species are in danger of dying out.

 

Luke Frishkoff, assistant professor of biology

 

“We are in the middle of an extinction crisis right now, and some species are more likely to go extinct in the next 100 years than others,” Frishkoff said. “Among researchers, there is a common assumption that specialization is a predicting factor for extinction. The narrower the niche, the less likely it is that a species could survive.”

Frishkoff will collaborate with Martha Muñoz, a thermal biologist at Yale University, and Luke Mahler, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Toronto, to examine three aspects of the animal’s niche: diet, where they live among vegetation and how they interact with temperature.

The team’s findings will inform researchers’ strategies to conserve vulnerable species. As a community ecologist fascinated by the question of why various types of animals choose to live where they do, Frishkoff has a driving ambition to preserve the world’s biological diversity.

“When we go hiking and observe the plants and animals that are assembled there, I feel a deep sense of mystery,” Frishkoff said. “For me, the deepest motivation is to understand the rules by which life exists in these complex ecosystems.”

Frishkoff said humans can learn a lot from anoles about how to sustain life on earth.

“These lizards are a treasure trove of knowledge about ecology and evolutionary history, and they are a great model for understanding the fundamental properties of life on earth,” Frishkoff said.

#DidYouAnole – Anolis stratulus


Photo: Chase G Mayers, iNaturalist

On the island of Puerto Rico this trunk-crown anole is locally called lagartijo manchando, but is also known as: the Puerto Rican spotted anole, spotted anole, banded anole, saddled anole, salmon lizard, barred anole, St. Thomas anole and chameleon.

They are possibly the most abundant anole in Puerto Rico but can also be found on the British Virgin Islands and US Virgin Islands. They can be spotted in a number of different habitats including urban environments, though they occupy buildings at a lower frequency than Anolis cristatellus. In Puerto Rico they can often be found in Tabonuco trees.


Photo: Steve Maldonado Silvestrini, iNaturalist

Spotted anoles are active foragers with an apparent preference for ants.

Males have an SVL of 40-44mm, and females an average of 46mm. They have large orange dewlaps that fade into yellow closer to the margins but female dewlaps are smaller and grey with orange near the throat. Spotted anoles are typically brown or pale gray with pale and dark coloured spots along its body. Unlike some of the anoles found in Puerto Rico, they don’t permanent crests but have a nuchal crest that they raise during antagonistic interactions and otherwise ridges down their backs. There is also a patch behind their eyes that darkens during these interactions as well, much like in Green anoles.


Photo: larsonek, iNaturalist

#DidYouAnole – Anolis sabanus


Photo: Delano Lewis, iNaturalist

This week’s anole, Anolis sabanus, can only be spotted on the island of Saba (Dutch W.I.).

Also called the Saban anole, this tan to pale grey coloured species is sexually dimorphic with males being covered with black spots/patches at an SVL of 29-72mm and females having a dorsal stripe and an SVL of 23-25mm. Their dewlaps are green or orange tinted.


Photo: Mark Yokoyama

In 2016, there was an introduction of the anole on the neighbouring island of Sint Eustatius. They belong to the bimaculatus series of anoles which includes other island endemics like Anolis oculatus (from my home island of Dominica).

Gina Zwicky, New Orleans based herper, is currently working on a study to see if there is a link between parasite pressure and the rise of immunity in generations of this anole, examining if evidence can be found of fluctuating selection in a natural population. Anoles are incredibly useful for research with their genomes being readily available for reference, how quickly they adapt and other factors. Island endemics especially are great research subjects due to their isolation which helps to eliminate certain other variables.


Photo: iNaturalist

#DidYouAnole – Anolis aeneus


Photo: Mikel2500, iNaturalist

Happy Thursday!

Today’s anole is the Bronze anole, Anolis aeneus! The Bronze anole can be found on most of the Grenadines (the small islands between St. Vincent and Grenada) and Grenada itself, and has been introduced to Trinidad & Tobago and Guyana.

Bronze anoles can be found in forests and some urban environments, and is one of many anole species that also feed on plant matter (Simmons et al., 2005), like nectar and seeds. Males have an SVL of 77mm while females are 55mm.


Photo: Mark Hulme, iNaturalist

Though called the Bronze anole, not all individuals are brown/bronze; some may be greyish brown or olive and their mottled pattern may be light or dark. The dewlap of the Bronze anole is pale white or green and spots of orange or yellow may be near the front edge. They spend a lot of time in a ‘survey posture’ sitting on tree trunks surveying the habitat for prey items that may come along.

Hybridisation between A. aeneus and A. trinitatis (St. Vincent bush anole) has been found to occur, with the possibility of fertile offspring (Losos, 2009).


Photo: Mike G Rutherford, iNaturalist

#DidYouAnole – Anolis cybotes


Photo: GotCritters, iNaturalist

Hello!

Thanks for sticking around while I did Black Birders Week planning, events and follow ups. I hope you were able to take part and check out the week. If not, we’ve archived the recordings and they all live somewhere on the internet which we’ve conveniently collected for you over on our website BlackAFinSTEM.com.

Now, for the anoles.

It’s funny how I accidentally did an anole this one is commonly mistaken for twice, but haven’t actually talked about it yet. But, Anolis cybotes is this week’s anole.

Commonly known as the large-headed/largehead anole because the males have really big heads (creative, I know), or the Hispaniolan stout anole, these lizards are native to Hispaniola and small neighbouring islands, but have been introduced to Suriname and everyone’s favourite state, Florida. Largehead anole males can have an SVL of ~65-70mm and females, ~52-60mm. Like many other stout brown patterned anoles, they’re also of the trunk-ground ecomorph and are territorial as adults.


Photo: Christian Nunes, iNaturalist

Male largehead anoles have a dirty white dewlap with no patterning, an easy way to tell them apart from the similarly coloured A. sagrei (red-orange dewlap), and A. cristatellus (yellow and orange dewlap). If you are able to take a closer look at its head in comparison with others, you should also be able to notice the blocky shape and size it got its name for.


Photo: GotCritters, iNaturalist

Anolis cybotes haa been studied with another similar sympatric anole, A. marcanoi, to see if anoles can recognise each other and other species by dewlap, which you can read here.

PS: It’s Pride Month and I am one of 23 scientists featured in the New Science Exhibit at Cal Academy; it’s also virtual so you can check it out here.

Ecomorphology of La Selva Anoles

Ever since the seminal papers by Williams and Rand [1,2], the Anolis radiation across the West Indies has increasingly established itself as an alluring example of ecomorphological convergence. Considering an Anolis community on one island, sympatric species have undergone niche partitioning, whereby each species has evolved particular behavioral, morphological, and ecological traits well-adapted for the microhabitat it occupies. Pop over to another island, and voilà, similar sets of ecomorphs can be found— their resemblance so striking and uncanny.

But the Anolis story isn’t clean cut. Studies of mainland anoles have yielded equivocal findings for whether they also conform to the beautiful patterns observed in the Caribbean. Much baseline data on mainland Anolis communities are needed to determine the extent to which convergence occurs and what factors drive differences in community structure. To partly address this gap, Jonathan Losos, Anthony Herrel, Ambika Kamath, and I recently published a paper describing the ecological morphology of anoles in a lowland tropical rainforest in Costa Rica, at La Selva Biological Station.

Accumulating field observations from four field seasons ranging from 2005 to 2017, we draw from over 1000 observations to characterize the habitat use of eight Anolis species that occur at La Selva. These species include Anolis humilis, Anolis limifrons, Anolis lemurinus, Anolis oxylophus, Anolis capito, Anolis carpenteri, Anolis biporcatus, and Anolis pentaprion, and we opted to devote a brief section to the co-occurring Polychrus gutturosus. Our results revealed overlapping niches and substantial variability in habitat use across many species. Furthermore, the morphologies of A. humilis and A. limifrons were at odds with microhabitat use following the predictions of Caribbean anole ecomorphology. Among the two most abundant species, relative hindlimb length was greater for the more arboreal A. limifrons, whereas it was shorter for the more terrestrial A. humilis.

If mainland and island anoles exhibit divergent ecomorphological patterns, this begs the question of how selective pressures differ between mainland and island habitats to drive these differences. Andrews [3] proposed that predation may more strongly influence Anolis diversification on the mainland, because in comparison to islands, predators are far more abundant, anole population densities are lower, and arthropod prey is plentiful. In contrast, Caribbean anoles are thought to be food limited and there may be stronger selection for niche partitioning. Through examining variation in species’ habitat use relative to the abundance of other co-occurring species at La Selva, our data suggests a low level of interspecific competition for this mainland community, corroborating the hypotheses Andrews set forth.

In recent years, the study of mainland anoles has received more attention. We are in great need of ecological, morphological, and life history trait data for Anolis communities throughout Central and South America to further our understanding of the evolutionary trajectories of mainland and island anoles. So, anole biologists, you can throw out your boats and steer clear of the oceanic divide!

 

[1] Rand, A. S., and E. E. Williams. 1969. The anoles of La Palma: aspects of their ecological relationships. Breviora 327:1–17.

[2] Williams, E. E. 1972. The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna: a trial analysis. Evolutionary Biology 6: 47–89.

[3] Andrews, R. M. 1979. Evolution of life histories: a comparison of Anolis lizards from matched island and mainland habitats. Breviora 454: 1–51.

A Newly Found Anole Is Not Necessarily Good News: the Brown Anole Is a New Invader in Israel

A brown anole in its unnatural habitat; Rishon LeZion, Israel. Photo: Aviad Bar

Shai Meiri, School of Zoology & the Steinhart Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University
uncshai@tauex.tau.ac.il

In late April 2021, someone posted a facebook image of a lizard seen in a residence garden in Rishon LeZion, a satellite city of Tel-Aviv, Israel (approximately 31.9611N, 34.7889E). Aviad Bar, one of the best herpetologists in Israel, identified it as a brown anole (Anolis sagrei Duméril & Bibron, 1837) and went there to investigate. He found around ten lizards in that garden, and managed to catch two of them. The preliminary identification was verified, and the lizards were later deposited in the national collections at the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, after the Israeli Nature and Parks Authority (INPA; the governmental body in charge of protecting nature in Israel) were consulted.

Anolis sagrei is potentially very bad news. It is one of the best models for the study of evolution in nature over short time scales across the animal kingdom (a more or less random sample of works includes: Losos et al. 2004, Schoener et al. 2005, Calsbeek and Cox 2010, Losos and Pringle 2011, Stuart et al. 2014, Kamath et al. 2020, Stroud et al. 2020, Donihue et al. 2021). But it is also one of the worst reptile invaders worldwide, alongside flowerpot snakes (Indotyphlops braminus), the mourning gecko (Lepidodactylus lugubris) red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta – we have those in Israel now too) and some Hemidactylus geckos (e.g., H. turcicus, which we may have helped to provide; H. frenatus). To date Anolis sagrei has invaded several states in continental USA (e.g., Florida, Louisiana, Texas), as well as Grand Cayman Island, Bermuda, Jamaica, Grenada, St. Vincent, the Canary Islands, multiple areas in Mexico, Belize, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama, Ecuador, Hawaii, Taiwan, and Singapore (Sexton and Brown 1977, Kraus 2009, Norval et al. 2012, Amador et al. 2017, Capinha et al. 2017, Stroud et al. 2017, Solis et al. 2017, Batista et al. 2019).

A brown anole caught in Rishon LeZion. Photo: Aviad Bar.

Furthermore, Anolis sagrei is known to compete with native anoles, mainly Anolis carolinensis a system very frequently studied (reviewed in Kraus 2009, and see e.g., Echternacht 1999, Losos and Spiller 1999, Gerber and Echternacht 2000, Stuart et al. 2014, Kamath et al. 2020). Effects on other anoles were also suggested (Losos et al. 1993 for A. conspersus; Batista et al. 2019 for Anolis gaigei), and competition with other lizards has been hypothesized (e.g., Stroud et al. 2017, Batista et al. 2019). Thus, a new record of A. sagrei from outside its native range is no cause for a celebration.
How did A. sagrei reach Israel? One hypothesis, raised by INPA, is that eggs have been transported accidentally in shipments, likely from the USA. We know A. sagrei eggs remain viable for weeks, and can even withstand some exposure to sea water (Hsu et al. 2021). There is a plant nursery not far from the place where A. sagrei was found in Israel, and reptiles have often been accidentally transported with plant shipments (e.g., the flowerpot snake; see e.g., Perry et al. 2006, Losos 2013, Auguste et al. 2018). Indeed, a shipment of wood from Italy arriving in Israel early in 2019 contained live Podarcis siculus (specimens were transferred to the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, and I identified them there). The USA is the #1 exporter of goods to Israel and considering A. sagrei is widespread in the US, it is a reasonable assumption.

A more plausible explanation soon emerged, however. Anolis sagrei has been in the pet trade in Israel for some time. Some third-party reports to Aviad Bar suggested that a private reptile enthusiast living in Rishon LeZion has been very successful in breeding Anolis sagrei and has simply been releasing juveniles or hatchlings into his back garden. Apparently, this has been going on for at least two and potentially 4-5 years. Thus, the source of the invasion seems to have been intentional (and illegal) introduction of individuals to nature.

The INPA asked me to write a report on potential threats posed by the brown anole and its chances of establishment and spread (Meiri 2021), then held a consultation, and commissioned Aviad Bar to survey the anole population in Rishon LeZion, and adjacent natural areas. Additionally, other Israeli herpetologists have tried to find the species around the area where it was first reported. The survey encountered some unexpected difficulties. For one, the recent horrible and useless spat of fighting between Israel and Hamas, which could and should have been avoided by both sides, caused unnecessary suffering on both, and seemed to have served only the extremely short-term purposes of “leaders” of both sides. Lizards had nothing to do with this apparently. The fighting forced the surveyors to stop the survey multiple times to take cover in shelters of complete strangers from incoming rockets. Luckily, none of them was hurt. Many people welcomed the surveyors into their garden and allowed them to look for and collect lizards. The survey (Bar 2021) was recently submitted to the INPA.

Anoles have been found in five streets in Rishon LeZion, with a maximum linear extent of ~500 m. Lizards have been found active by day on walls, fences, vegetation and on the ground, and to sleep on branches at night – typical anole behavior. Worryingly, anoles of all sizes, from adults >60 mm SVL to small hatchling-sized individuals, were found throughout the study area, strongly suggesting the lizards breed in Israel. Anolis sagrei breeds extremely fast, especially in regions where it is invasive where it matures early and reduces its already incredibly short inter-laying interval (e.g., Jensen et al. 2008, Fetters and Mcglothlin 2017). Basically, one gets the impression (or at least I do) that introduced Anolis sagrei lay eggs (almost) as fast as domestic chickens. It seems to further be helped by light pollution – growing faster and reproducing earlier where artificial lights are available at night (Thawley and Kolbe 2020) – like they are in Rishon LeZion.

Anoles were also highly abundant. Aviad (Bar 2021) found 101 anoles during his survey, and Akiva Topper and Oren Kolodny have found 28 in a single night. For comparison, the second most abundant reptile found during Aviad’s survey was the common chameleon, Chamaeleo chamaeleon – with 15 specimens. The third most abundant was the commensal (and in Israel, native) house gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus (10 animals). In fact, only 41 reptiles other than A. sagrei were found in the survey, of all species (including those identified only from tracks!). Thus in terms of abundance, A. sagrei seems to outclass all other reptiles put together by a factor of at least 2.5-to-1. That this species can be extremely abundant in places it has invaded is well known (e.g., Campbell and Echternacht 2003).

While A. sagrei has invaded many places the world over, it seems to have been confined to tropical or subtropical countries (and the subtropical parts of the USA), and this is the first report of it inhabiting higher latitudes and non-tropical climates (except perhaps some potential places in the USA). One hope expressed early was that the relatively cool Mediterranean winters prevailing in central Israel will prove detrimental for anoles. Yet, like it probably does in some cities in the USA, A. sagrei seem not to mind what goes for winters near the Mediterranean coastlines of Israel. A combination of the climatic effects of the warm puddle that is the eastern Mediterranean Sea and warm microhabitats likely found in urban residential gardens seem to allow it to easily survive the winter. Watering of said gardens likely allows it to easily survive the arid climate of the long Israeli summers (where very little rain, if any, falls in April or October, and virtually none in between). Thus, urban areas seem to present for the anoles the kind of climate and microhabitats it thrives in in its native and introduced range.

Could it spread outside of the cities? As far as we know following Aviad’s survey (Bar 2021), no anoles were found in natural areas bordering its current urban distribution. The little water available there for most of the year may preclude its establishment. But it is highly likely that, if accidentally transported, it could easily establish in habitats where abundant water is available year-round. Such as streams and pools, artificial and natural.

How much of a threat is posed by Anolis sagrei to Israeli nature is less certain. As far as I know few have tried to estimate its effect on arthropod and other prey-species communities (but see Losos 2011,2020). I certainly cannot guess it. Actual reports of Anolis sagrei impacting other vertebrate taxa seem to be confined to its effect on congenerics (even Stroud et al., 2017, only mentions potential impacts), of which Israel has none. But a super-fecund, and highly abundant, species such as the brown anole could potentially compete with other small terrestrial and arboreal lizards (and juveniles of larger species), of which the Israeli coastal plain has many (Bar et al. 2021). I can easily envision it competing with, and potentially preying on lizards such as Mediodactylus orientalis, Hemidactylus turcicus, Phoenicolacerta laevis and Heremites vittatus – at least juvenile ones (and it could easily prey on adult Ablepharus rueppellii, if it can find it in the grass and leaf litter).

Aviad Bar with other lizards he recently caught (Varanus griseus). These ones are unlikely to be harmed by any anole and in fact are totally unrelated to this story. But Aviad sent the picture to me alongside the anole photos, and it was just too good to waste.

Right now, probably 2-5 years after it first invaded, A. sagrei seems to be doing extremely well in its new introduced range in Israel – but it is still probably very localized. This means that we have a unique opportunity to deal with it before it spreads further. Our record of dealing with reptile invasions in Israel is abysmal. Few reptile species have been introduced to Israel: Cyrtopodion scabrum, Trachemys scripta and more recently (Jamison et al. 2017) Tarentola annularis (Meiri et al. 2019, Bar et al. 2021). As far as I know, no attempt has been made to stop the spread of C. scabrum and T. scripta. The story of T. annularis is even more telling. Despite being larger, meaner, and potentially far more aggressive species than A. sagrei, and being introduced to a single locality, very little has been done to try and curb its invasion. One person was employed, for a few months, to try to control what was already a population numbering in the thousands – and even this effort was stopped for lack of funding (read: being of very low perceived priority).

I hope this will not be the case with Anolis sagrei too. We have the potential to stop the invasion, still in its infancy, in its tracks. The INPA seem to have the will (and certainly has the means) to do it, and I wish them luck and perseverance. This is an outlet of anole lovers so please don’t get me wrong. I do not wish for Israel to be the next test case of fascinating scientific work on the rapid evolution of Anolis sagrei. We want to keep anoles those wonderful and lizards we read about in papers and books (e.g., Roughgarden 1995, Losos 2009). I want us to keep on having to go and find them in places we find exotic (if there is anything Rishon LeZion is not, it is exotic). I want to engage with the scientists who study them on their own turf. Let’s keep anoles in the Neotropics where they belong.


References
Amador, L., Ayala-Varela, F., Narvaez, A. E., Cruz, K. and Torres-Carvajal, O. 2017. First record of the invasive brown anole, Anolis sagrei Dumeril & Bibron, 1837 (Squamata: Iguanidae: Dactyloinae), in South America. Check List 13: 2083.

Auguste, R.J., Dass, K. and Baldeo, D. 2018. Discovery of the Puerto Rican crested anole, Anolis cristatellus Duméril & Bibron, on Trinidad. Caribbean Herpetology, 63: 1-2.

Bar, A. 2021. Summary of a preliminary survey to evaluate the establishment and distribution of the species brown anole (Anolis sagrei). Report to the chief ecologist of the Israeli Nature and Parks Authority, Pazbar, Herzlia. In Hebrew.

Bar, A., Haimovitch, G. and Meiri, S. 2021. Field guide to the amphibians and reptiles of Israel. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt Am Main. In Press.
Batista, A, Ponce, M., Garces, O., Lassiter, E. and Miranda, M. 2019. Silent pirates: Anolis sagrei Dumeril & Bibron, 1837 (Squamata, Dactyloidae) taking over Panama City, Panama. Check List 15: 455-459.
Calsbeek, R. and Cox, R. M. 2010. Experimentally assessing the relative importance of predation and competition as agents of selection. Nature 465: 613-616.
Campbell, T. S. and Echternacht, A. C. 2003. Introduced species as moving targets: changes in body sizes of introduced lizards following experimental introductions and historical invasions. Biological Invasions 5: 193-212.
Capinha, C., Seebens, H., Cassey, P., Garcia‐Diaz, P., Lenzner, B., Mang, T., Moser, D., Pysek, P., Rodder, D., Scalera, R. and Winter, M. 2017. Diversity, biogeography and the global flows of alien amphibians and reptiles. Diversity and Distributions 23: 1313-1322.
Donihue, C. M., Kowaleski, A. M., Losos, J. B., Algar, A. C., Baeckens, S., Buchkowski, R. W., Fabre, A. C., Frank, H. K., Geneva, A. J., Reynolds, R. G., Stroud, J. T., Velasco, J. A., Kolbe, J. J., Mahler, D. L. and Herrel, A. 2020. Hurricane effects on Neotropical lizards span geographic and phylogenetic scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117: 10429-10434.
Echternacht, A. C. 1999. Possible causes for the rapid decline in population density of green anoles, Anolis carolinensis (Sauria: Polychrotidae) following invasion by the brown anole, Anolis sagrei, in the southeastern United States. Anolis Newsletter 5: 22–27.
Fetters, T. L. and Mcglothlin, J. W. 2017. Life histories and invasions: accelerated laying rate and incubation time in an invasive lizard, Anolis sagrei. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 122: 635-642.
Gerber, G. P. and Echternacht, A. C. 2000. Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards. Oecologia 124: 599–607.
Hsu, M. H., Lin, J. W., Liao, C. P., Hsu, J. Y. and Huang, W. S. 2021. Trans-marine dispersal inferred from the saltwater tolerance of lizards from Taiwan. PLoS One, 16: e0247009.
Jamison, S., Tamar, K., Slavenko, A. and Meiri, S. 2017. Tarentola annularis (Squamata: Phyllodactylidae): a new invasive species in Israel. Salamandra 53: 299-303.
Jensen, J. B., Camp, C. D., Gibbons, W. and Elliot, M. J. 2008. Amphibians and reptiles of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens.
Kamath, A., Herrmann, N. C., Gotanda, K., Shim, K. C., LaFond, J., Cottone, G., Falkner, H., Campbell, T. S. and Stuart, Y. E. 2020. Character displacement in the midst of background evolution in island populations of Anolis lizards: a spatiotemporal perspective. Evolution 74: 2250-2264.
Kraus, F. 2009. Alien reptiles and amphibians. A scientific compendium and analysis. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Losos, J. B. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of Anoles. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Losos, J. B. and Pringle, R. M. 2011. Competition, predation and natural selection in island lizards. Nature 475: E1-E2.
Losos, J. B. and Spiller, D. A. 1999. Differential colonization success and assymmetrical interactions between two lizard species. Ecology 80: 252-258.
Losos, J. B., Marks, J. C. and Schoener, T. W. 1993. Habitat use and ecological interactions of an introduced and a native species of Anolis lizard on Grand Cayman, with a review of the outcomes of anole introductions. Oecologia 95: 525-532.
Losos, J. B., Schoener, T. W. and Spiller, D. A. 2004. Predator-induced behaviour shifts and natural selection in field-experimental lizard populations. Nature 432: 505-508.
Meiri, S., Belmaker, A., Berkowic, D., Kazes, K., Maza, E., Bar-Oz, G. and Dor, R. 2019. A checklist of Israeli land vertebrates. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 65: 43-50.
Meiri, S. 2021. The brown anole in Israel, assessing the invasion pathway, establishment potential and potential threats. Report to the chief ecologist, Israel Nature and Parks Authority. In Hebrew.
Norval, G., Huang, S.-C., Mao, J.-J., Goldberg, S. R. and Slater, K. 2012. Additional notes on the diet of Japalura swinhonis (Agamidae) from southwestern Taiwan, with comments about its dietary overlap with the sympatric Anolis sagrei (Polychrotidae). Basic and Applied Herpetology, 26: 87-97.

Perry, G., Powell, R. and Watson, H. 2006. Keeping invasive species off Guana Island, British Virgin Islands. Iguana, 13: 273-277.

Roughgarden, J. 1995. Anolis lizards of the Caribbean: ecology, evolution, and plate tectonics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Schoener, T. W., Losos, J. B. and Spiller, D. A. 2005. Island biogeography of populations: an introduced species transforms survival patterns. Science 310: 1807-1809.
Sexton, O. J. and Brown, K. M. 1977. The reproductive cycle of an iguanid lizard Anolis sagrei, from Belize. Journal of Natural History, 11: 241-250.
Solis, J. M., Ayala-Rojas, C. G. and O’Reilly, C. M. 2017. New records for two reptiles from the Bay islands, Honduras. Mesoamerican Herpetology 4: 669-671.
Stroud, J. T., Giery, S. T. and Outerbridge, M. E. 2017. Establishment of Anolis sagrei on Bermuda represents a novel ecological threat to Critically Endangered Bermuda skinks (Plestiodon longirostris). Biological Invasions, 19: 1723-1731.
Stroud, J. T., Mothes, C. C., Beckles, W., Heathcote, R. J., Donihue, C. M. and Losos, J. B. 2020. An extreme cold event leads to community-wide convergence in lower temperature tolerance in a lizard community. Biology Letters, 16: 20200625.
Stuart, Y. E., Campbell, T. S., Hohenlohe, P. A., Reynolds, R. G., Revell, L. J. and Losos, J. B. 2014. Rapid evolution of a native species following invasion by a congener. Science 346: 463-465.
Thawley, C. J. and Kolbe, J. J. 2020. Artificial light at night increases growth and reproductive output in Anolis lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 287: 20191682.


New Research Explores Evolutionary History of Central and South American Anoles

The mainland ground anole Anolis tandai from Brazil. (Photo: Ivan Prates)

The mainland ground anole Anolis tandai from Brazil. (Photo: Ivan Prates)

From GW Today:

June 02, 2021

By Kristen Mitchell

A George Washington University Columbian College of Arts and Sciences Ph.D. student recently published a paper about the evolution of Central and South American anoles, a group of tropical lizards that have been historically understudied compared to their distant relatives in the Caribbean. The study was a collaboration with researchers from the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History.

Jonathan Huie, a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Biological Sciences, got involved in this work as an undergraduate student through a National Science Foundation research internship at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. This research sparked his passion for lizards and ultimately guided him toward a doctoral program studying salamanders at GW.

Mr. Huie is lead author of the new paper, published in The Biological Journal of the Linnean Society on Wednesday. Mr. Huie spoke to GW Today about the impact of this research.

Q: Why has there historically been such a significant gap between what researchers know about Caribbean anoles and what they know about anoles found in Central and South America?
A: Most of the 400-plus species of anoles live in Central and South America, and yet the lion’s share of anole research has focused on Caribbean species. There are likely several reasons why, but ease and accessibility are definitely important factors. In the Caribbean, anoles are quite abundant and easy to find but mainland anoles are more secretive, likely because they have more predators to hide from. It’s difficult to study what you can’t see.

Another reason may be because islands themselves are excellent study systems. They’re small and easier to make sense of compared to mainland systems. There’s also a lot of them, which is ideal for replication and hypothesis testing. Lastly, science is often conducted where it’s easiest or most desirable to establish a field site so it’s probably no coincidence that many well-studied anoles occur near vacation spots.

With that said, there’s been a huge push in recent years to learn more about mainland anoles. Our study wouldn’t have been possible otherwise, but there is still a lot we don’t know about mainland anoles.

Q: What did your research reveal about how anoles in Central and South America have evolved to fill various ecological niches?
A: Anoles originated on the mainland, then they colonized the Caribbean, and eventually re-invaded the mainland. Caribbean anoles are well-known among biologists for repeatedly evolving sets of species with similar ecologies and morphologies on Cuba, Hispaniola, Jamaica and Puerto Rico. For example, some species live on thin perches like twigs and have convergently evolved short limbs and well-developed toe pads. Other species specialize in living in tree-crowns, on tree trunks, grasses and bushes. We found that when anoles diversified on the mainland the second time, they convergently re-evolved all of the same habitat specialists and morphological adaptations found in the Caribbean—but this time in Central and South America. This is fascinating given what we often believe to be true about islands and continents.

Our second main finding was that ground-dwelling anoles are really common on the mainland and have their own set of morphological adaptations. Many Caribbean anoles forage on the ground, but very few live there full-time. Mainland ground anoles, on the other hand, really took off. We hypothesized that ground anoles are common on the mainland—at least among the group that re-invaded the mainland—because most arboreal niches were already occupied by other lizards. It’s unclear why Caribbean ground anoles are not more abundant.

GW Ph.D. student Jonathan Huie (center) poses with his mentors Ivan Prates (left) and Kevin de Queiroz (right) at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History in 2018. (Photo: Smithsonian)

Q: How do your findings challenge long-held assumptions made about evolution on islands compared to mainland habitats?
A: We found that island and mainland anoles are more similar than previously thought. For a long time, it was believed that islands were hotbeds for extreme morphologies and that continents lacked the necessary conditions. In the context of anoles, island species were considered to be unique—that the relationship between habitat and morphology was fundamentally different on islands versus the mainland. However, we found strong evidence that this is not the case.

That is not to say that everything we once thought to be true is now wrong—there are still many differences between island and mainland anoles. However, our research shifts how we should view island and mainland comparisons. Our paper joins other recent studies in suggesting that the mainland is equally good at cultivating morphological diversity as island environments.

Q: How did you get involved in this research, and how did it shape the kind of research you are doing now as a Ph.D. candidate?
A: I got involved as an undergraduate National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) intern at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History in 2018, under the co-mentorship of Ivan Prates and Kevin de Queiroz. I was a total fish geek and had never studied anoles, but I signed on to investigate the link between habitat and morphology in a handful of mainland anoles.

I measured their body proportions using the museum’s natural history collection but finished quickly. So, we started adding more and more species, and even after the internship was over, I continued to visit other natural history collections to measure even more lizards. The next thing I knew, I had looked at more than 200 species. Natural history collections like the Smithsonian were absolutely critical for this work and fostering my interests beyond fishes.

As a Ph.D. student, I am currently studying salamander limbs to better understand the type of adaptations needed to make the water-to-land transition. The kinds of questions I am interested in for my dissertation are similar to the ones we approached with the anole project. Without my internship, it’s very unlikely that I would have ended up at GW studying salamanders.

Q: How are you planning to build on this research moving forward?
A: There is still so much left to do. In our recent paper, we only published about half of the data I initially collected. We are excited to dive deeper and look at how body size influences patterns of morphological adaptation.

There’s also the other group of mainland anoles that we didn’t look at. I am interested in knowing more about how these other mainland species fit into the puzzle. Did they adapt in a similar manner as the group of mainland anoles we looked at? Or are they doing something different? We would like to know how often evolution repeats itself to produce similar outcomes.

Page 22 of 153

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén