Symposium On The Biological Impacts Of Tropical Climate Warming On Ectotherms

Abstracts for Symposim -image -first pageQuite a line-up! This August in San Juan. Schedule below, and details on their website, as are the abstracts:

DAY I:  August 1, 2013

8:30 Ray Huey        Opening remarks

9:00 Ariel Lugo      Climate change or land cover change? Which is driving some lizards to the lowlands?

9:30 Jennifer Sunday   Global patterns of thermal tolerance and range limits in ectotherms

10:00 Barry Sinervo   On the risk of extinction of tropical ectotherms: Are they buffered against climate?

10:30 Coffee Break

11:00 Elvira Cuevas   Update of climate change in the Caribbean, and projections on soil nutrient cycling and interactions

11:30 Omar Gutierrez    Significant diurnal and seasonal variation in soil CO2 efflux is positively related to temperature in a moist subtropical forest in Puerto Rico

12:00 Lauren Buckley   Thermal specialization of ecotherms on tropical mountains

12:30 Michael Kearney   The thermodynamic niches of tropical ectotherms

1:00 Lunch Break

2:30 Mike Kaspari    Life in the boundary zone–the thermal ecology of small cursorial insects

3:00 Patricia Burrowes     Climate change efects on Caribbean seasonality and its implications on an ectotherm host-pathogen dynamics

3:30 Carlos Navas    Vulnerability of anuran amphibians to climate change: inferring the impact of water availability and temperature

4:00 Ana C. Carnaval   Integrating data sets to validate models of biological response to former climate change in the Brazilian Atlantic forest

4:30 Coffee Break

5:00 Mridul Thomas   The effects of ocean warming on marine phytoplankton diversity

5:30 Brad Lister     Long-term declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web

DAY II: August 2, 2013

8:30 Martha M. Muñoz   Evolutionary stasis and lability in thermal physiology in a group of tropical lizards

9:00 Luisa Otero     Effects of recent climate warming on the reproductive phenology of Puerto Rican Anolis lizards

9:30 Alexander Gunderson   Behavioral responses to thermal variation: implications for predicting the biological impacts of climate change

10:00 Michael L. Logan Population level differences in thermal ecology suggest resilience to warming among Honduran Anolis lizards

10:30 Ignacio de la Riva    Thermal ecology of Bolivian lizards of the genus Liolaemus: Will climate warming drive them to extinction?

11:00 Mat Vickers     Sunshine, on a cloudy day

11:30 Michael Angilletta    Symposium highlights

12:00 Leave for Field Trip to El Verde

Hybridization In Puerto Rican Grass Anoles: Another View

Anolis pulchellus with a cool aggressive display. Photo by Manuel Leal.

A few days back, we reported on a recent paper on hybridization between the Puerto Rican grass-bush anoles, A. krugi and A. pulchellus. But what better way to get the backstory than to hear it straight from the horse’s mouth? So, check out co-author Manuel Leal’s description of how the paper came to be over at Chipojolab.

Bark Anole Embryos

Developing bark anole embryo. Photo by Catherine May.

A while back, Anthony Geneva offered excess A. distichus eggs from their breeding colonies to any researchers would could use them. Some were sent to Kenro Kusumi’s lab at Arizona State, and Catherine May has now published some cool images of embryos at different ages (1-7 days old and 14+ days old).

(K)night Anoles: Nocturnal Activity Facilitated By Artificial Lights?

An interesting aspect of human activity and urban development is the ability of species to respond to new opportunities that did not previously exist. We have seen previous posts (1, 2) on Anole Annals highlighting nocturnal activity in anoles, which are recognised as a predominantly diurnal group. Here is another short observation that I and Sean Giery (of previous Knight Anole fame) observed a while ago whilst doing some night herping at Fairchild Tropical Botanical Gardens which will be published as a short natural history note in an upcoming edition of Herp Review:

On 18 April 2013 between 22:03-22:15 h, a single adult Cuban knight anole Anolis equestris was observed at Fairchild Tropical Botanical Gardens, Miami FL (25.677°N, 80.276°W, WGS84). This individual was observed consuming Lepidoptera attracted to an artificial light source positioned above a doorway. Nocturnal lizards (Hemidactylus mabouia) were also present around the light source and could represent another potential prey source for nocturnally foraging A. equestris. This is the first documentation of A. equestris using artificial light sources to allow for nocturnal activity.

Cuban knight anole (Anolis equestris) active and foraging at night with the aid of a wall light above a door

Cuban knight anole (Anolis equestris) active and foraging at night with the aid of a wall light above a door

This behavioural plasticity provides not only a fascinating, but also just a really cool new branch of anole research. This could be highlighted particularly well with introduced species which may experience interspecific competition levels along axes which in their native range they may not have been exposed to. Stay tuned!

That Other Enormous New World Clade Of Lizards: Liolaemus

Liolaemus tenuis, if I’m not mistaken. Photo by Felipe Rabanal.

South American fence lizard lookalikes Liolaemus keep on racking up the species numbers as new taxa are described willy-nilly. Over at Tetzoo, Darren Naish has written a nice post entitled “The enormous lioaemine radiation: paradoxical herbivory, viviparity, evolutionary cul-de-sacs and the impending mass extinction.” It’s a very nice overview of the different aspects of diversity of this clade, including summary of an interesting recent paper by Pincheira-Donoso and colleagues, and includes the chilling statement: “some herpetologists think that the Liolaemus radiation will eventually exceed the Anolis (sensu lato!) one in terms of number of species.”

Evolution 2013: Best Tattoo Features Anolis Proboscis

proboscis tattooxThe just concluded evolution meetings in Snowbird, UT featured many highlights, but surely none more sensational than this fantastic tattoo adorning the arm of Tulane graduate student Justin Yeager. Justin, whose very cool research focuses on poison arrow frogs, bioluminescent millipedes and mantisflies, assures that a space is reserved on his other arm for a lady proboscis, which as we all know is hornless.

Word on the street is that there are some other very cool anole tattoos out there. Photos welcome!

Fill In The Blank: Obscure Anole Life History Traits

In collaboration with the Conservation Biology course taught by Dr. Karen Beard here at Utah State University, where I am a Ph.D. student, I have been involved in gathering life history data on ~400 species of reptiles that have been introduced outside of their native ranges for an analysis of how life history traits (e.g., diet, fecundity, longevity) interact with other factors to influence the likelihood of successful establishment. Appendix A of Fred Kraus’ 2009 book Alien Reptiles and Amphibians is the source of the species list we are using, and included in this analysis are 26 species of Anolis. This is where you come in.

First, we coded all anoles as (i) sexually-dichromatic, (ii) diurnal, (iii) non-venomous, (iv) oviparous, (v) omnivores that lack (vi) temperature-dependent sex determination and (vii) parthenogenesis. Is anyone aware of any exceptions to these seven generalizations?

Second, we searched for data on clutch size, clutch frequency, incubation time, and longevity. The Anole Classics section of this site and the Biodiversity Heritage Library were particularly useful. After conducting what I feel to be a pretty thorough literature scavenger hunt, I am forced to conclude that some of these data simply do not exist at the species level for all of the species we’re interested in, or are not explicitly stated in a way that is obvious to a non-anole-expert. Of course, there is a lot of literature, including many books that I don’t have access to, and there are also lots of credible observations that don’t get published. I’m hoping that some of the readership here can help fill in at least some of the blanks in the table below. As one member of the team, I did not collect all of the data that are filled in myself, nor have I personally vetted every value, so if you spot an error please do point it out.

Two important points:

  1. Many environmental factors obviously influence the life history parameters of our beloved and wonderfully plastic reptiles, so we appreciate that many of these values would be better represented by ranges and are dependent on latitude, altitude, climate, and many other factors. Where a range is published, we are using its median value.
  2. I should also emphasize that, because of the large size of this study and the diversity of taxa included (ranging in size from giants like Burmese Pythons, Nile Crocodiles, and Aldabra Tortoises to, well, anoles and blindsnakes), it is more important for the data to reflect the relative values of these life history parameters across all anoles (and all reptiles) than it is to specifically and precisely represent all known variation within a given species of anole.

Without further ado (for your enjoyment, and because I know from my own blog that nobody reads posts lacking pictures, I’ve embedded an image of each species):

Species Median clutch size Median clutches per year Incubation time (days) Maximum longevity (months)
A aeneus
A. aeneus
2
A baleatus
A. baleatus
A bimaculatus
A.bimaculatus            
2 43 84
A carolinensis
A. carolinensis
1.15 6  41.5 65
A chlorocyanus
A.chlorocyanus
1 18
A conspersus
A. conspersus
1
A cristatellus
A. cristatellus
2.5 18 83
A cybotes
A. cybotes
1 18 45
A distichus
A. distichus
1 16 45.5
A equestris
A. equestris
1 1 48 149
A extremus
A. extremus
A ferreus
A. ferreus
1 18
A garmani
A. garmani
1.5 18 67
A grahami
A. grahami
1
A leachii
A. leachii
A lineatus
A. lineatus
A lucius
A. lucius
1 3.5 60
A marmoratus
A. marmoratus
2  50
A maynardi
A. maynardi
A porcatus
A. porcatus
1 18 63.5
A pulchellus
A. pulchellus
1
A richardii
A. richardii
1
A sagrei
A. sagrei
2 20  32 22
A stratulus
A. stratulus
A trinitatis
A. trinitatis
2  50
A wattsi
A. wattsi
1

Thanks in advance. I think this is a great blog and I hope to post something more interesting on here soon.

Evolution 2013: How Hormonal Pleiotropy Affects Sex Differences In Body Size

Anolis sagrei mating. Image from Bob Cox's lab website (http://faculty.virginia.edu/coxlab/Cox_Lab/Home.html)

Anolis sagrei mating. Image from Bob Cox’s lab website 

Although the Evolution meetings are coming to a close, we get to go out on a high note. Christian Cox gave one of the last talks of the day discussing the hormonal basis for gender differences in sexual size dimorphism in anoles. Sexual size dimorphism (SSD), or the tendency for the sexes to differ in the size of different traits, has been widely documented in nature. Usually the male exhibits comparatively larger features, such as bigger body size or larger ornaments. Anoles are an intriguing case of SSD, as the traits that can exhibit dimorphism can vary widely among species. Some species, such as Anolis carolinensis, exhibit SSD in multiple traits, including body size, head shape, and dewlap size. In contrast, other species exhibit minimal SSD. As an example, A. distichus from the Caribbean island of Hispaniola tends to show no SSD in body size or head shape, but has strong SSD in dewlap size.

Christian Cox and his collaborators posit that one mechanism underlying SSD may be a pleiotropic regulator that can couple and decouple dimorphism in different phenotypes and their candidate for this study was testosterone. They conducted experiments manipulating levels of testosterone in adult males and females of Anolis sagrei and assessed how body size, head shape, and dewlap traits changed. Anolis sagrei is a particularly good system for assessing the role of SSD in anoles. Male A. sagrei can be up to 50% larger and three times more massive than females.

To conduct the study, they took three year-old male and female lizards and gave them either testosterone or blank subdermal implants. They maintained lizards under laboratory conditions for two months and then gathered information on morphological dimensions and dewlap characteristics. Under testosterone treatment, males and females grew similarly, whereas males grew faster than females in the control group. This merits restating – they were able to make females grow like males just by applying testosterone! Clearly testosterone has strong effects on male-specific growth patterns.

To determine if testosterone affects metabolism, they measured metabolic rate using stop-flow respirometry. They found that testosterone treatment increased metabolic rate for males and females. Correspondingly, they found that visceral fat bodies were lower in testosterone treated animals, suggesting that increased growth is caused by shunting energy towards growth and away from storage metabolism. They further determined that testosterone treatment increased the size of the humerus and femur, but had no significant effect on jaw length and head width. Because this species exhibits little SSD with respect to head dimensions, perhaps this finding is not surprising, but I would be curious to know whether testosterone influences skull growth in species with SSD in head dimensions, such as A. carolinensis.

Finally, the authors found that testosterone led to increased dewlap size in both males and females. In fact, the dewlaps of testosterone-treated females were comparable in size to those of control males and eroded the sex differences that otherwise existed between them. Testosterone treatment decreased the saturation and brightness in the dewlap, leading the authors to suggest that it accelerates its development, as they posit that this color is representative of the fully developed dewlap in the wild.

Thus, they find strong evidence that testosterone plays a large role in modulating SSD in anoles. In particular, it abolishes differences in growth in various traits except for skull shape. And it can create male-like females as well as forge super-males. It would be interesting to see if, in addition to acquiring a male-like morphology, the females would tend to act like males, as well. Their next step is to conduct testosterone manipulation experiments in A. distichus, a species that has low SSD in body size and head shape, but strong SSD in dewlap size, to determine if the effects of testosterone are repeatable in a system exhibiting a pattern of SSD that is different from A. sagrei.

*****************

Extreme sex differences in the development of body size and sexual signals are mediated by hormonal pleiotropy in a dimorphic lizard. Authors: Cox, Christian L.; Hanninen, Amanda F; Cox, Robert M.

Evolution 2013: Sex-Specific Molecular Markers From Genome Sequencing

Gamble and Zarkower (2012) Current Biology

Gamble and Zarkower (2012) Current Biology

Tony Gamble, a postdoctoral researcher working with Dave Zarkower at the University of Minnesota, presented his work on uncovering sex-specific markers in geckos and anoles. Recent years have seen a large impetus to understand how sex chromosomes evolve. Sex chromosomes can be involved in sex-specific adaptation, genetic conflict, and other important modes of evolution. This line of research is particularly imperative in reptiles because not only do we have comparatively little information about sex chromosomes in this group, but different types of sex determining mechanisms have evolved multiple times and so there are likely multiple sex-specific mechanisms and multiple evolutionary transitions are at play (see Figure above).

Traditionally sex chromosomes were discovered by karyotyping, which is a method of separating and identifying the chromosomes. This is problematic in reptiles because the sex chromosomes of many species are homomorphic, meaning they are similarly shaped and, oftentimes, quite small. Gamble and Zarkower tried a different approach – RADseq – for identifying sex chromosomes. RADseq uses restriction enzymes to identify sex-specific markers. Their reasoning is that in XY systems (i.e., males are the heterogametic sex), you would expect males and females to exhibit X-specific markers and males to exhibit sex-specific markers unique to the Y (i.e., the non-recombining region). In ZW systems (i.e., females are the heterogametic sex), you would expect the opposite. In theory, this could prove a cheap and fast way to determine the sex chromosomes of different species and develop sex-specific markers.

The challenge for this study was to determine the sex chromosomes for the crested gecko and for the anole. Unlike the crested gecko, Anolis is genome-enabled and we have evidence that they are an XY system, and so they used anoles to pilot their method and confirm that it works before trying it on the crested gecko. However, anoles are not without their challenges. The sex chromosomes are not only homomorphic, but they are also micromorphic, meaning they are quite small. Furthermore, the Anolis genome was built using a female anole, making finding sex-specific markers on the non-recombining region (i.e., the Y chromosome) that much more challenging. Their RADseq approach worked quite well, however, as they were able to recover a male-specific marker in A. carolinensis, which they were able to confirm with PCR amplification. They repeated their results using more A. carolinensis (from a different clade), A. sagrei, and A. lineatopus, and were able to recover the same locus. When they conducted this method in the crested gecko, they found evidence for a ZW system and, correspondingly, recoverd two female-specific markers. Thus, they found that RADseq will work in a variety of taxa, even if they are not genome-enabled, and can successfully be used to uncover sex-specific markers. A neat application of this method is that, using their sex-specific primers, you can sequence an embryo to determine its sex, something that was not previously possible.

Evolution 2013: The Genomics Of Anole Pigmentation

Figure from Nicholson et al. (2007) showing variation in dewlap color among various species of anoles.

Figure from Nicholson et al. (2007) showing variation in dewlap color among various species of anoles.

As Nick Crawford, recent Ph.D. of Boston University, points out, the genomics era allows scientists unprecedented access to understanding the genetic basis of adaptation and, by extension, the genetics of speciation. For his doctoral thesis, Nick focused on understanding the genetics of colorful adaptation in Anolis lizards, which is genome-enabled. Adaptive radiations provide lots of variation among closely related organisms, making anoles a great system for studying the genetics of adaptation.

One feature of anoles that really stands out is how colorful they are. Just a casual glance at some of the color variation in dewlaps among species reveals that color is likely an important component of species diversification in anoles. Nick focused on Anolis marmoratus, a colorful anole from the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe. Anolis marmoratus is an excellent choice for studying the genetics underlying color. This species exhibits strong geographic variation in coloration and, as I discussed in my talk a few days ago, lacks a strong signal of genetic structure. In this case, searching for the genes underlying local adaptation can be conducted without the confounding effects of population structure.

One of Nick's slides showing the ranges of A. m. marmoratus (orange color) and A. m. speciosus (blue) on the islands of Basse Terre (left) and Grande Terre (right) in Guadeloupe.

One of Nick’s slides showing the ranges of A. m. marmoratus (orange color) and A. m. speciosus (blue) on the islands of Basse Terre (left) and Grande Terre (right) in Guadeloupe.

Nick focused on A. m. marmoratus, which has red marbling on its head, and A. m. speciosus, which has a blue head and, oftentimes, a blue body and tail. These two species are clinally distributed along the eastern side of Basse Terre and A. m. speciosus ranges into the nearby island of Grande Terre (see Figure 1). Rather than use RAD tags, Nick sequenced the genomes for 20 individuals (10 each per subspecies). For every 5 kb along the genome, Nick measured divergence using various metrics of structure and assessed sequence divergence.

Overall, Nick found that about 2% of the genome falls within divergent regions for these two subspecies. Importantly, he found divergence in two genes involved in carotenoid pigmentation and one gene involved in melanosome transport. Divergence in the two carotenoid genes could very well underlie the color divergence in A. m. marmoratus, which has distinct red marbling on its head. These genes fall in regions containing several fixed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a row. Nick suggests that these are likely single haplotypes that are being selected in different environments. Finally, he found no evidence of coding sequence changes, and so he posits that the modifications are probably cis-regulatory in nature. For many years we have been waiting to find out how divergence in coloration occurs in anoles. After seeing Nick’s work, it appears we are closer than ever before to understanding local color adaptation at a genomic level, so stayed tuned to his work for more to come.

Page 194 of 305

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén