The adhesive structures of geckos have been the subject of extensive inquiry across a variety of disciplines ever since Autumn et al. (2002) discovered that van der Waals intermolecular forces are the main driver of gecko adhesion. Geckos adhere to surfaces using expanded subdigital scales (scansors/lamellae) that are covered in thousands of beta-keratin fibrils (setae) that branch into hundreds or thousands of triangular-shaped tips (spatulae) that are about 200 nanometers in width (see slideshow for images). Spatulae make intimate contact with a surface resulting in van der Waals intermolecular forces. Gecko adhesive toe pads are multifunctional; they are a reversible dry adhesive, they can adhere to a variety of surfaces, they can adhere underwater in some conditions, they have self-cleaning and self-drying capabilities, and they can adhere in a vacuum (see Autumn et al. 2014 for a recent review of gecko adhesion). A number of gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives have been generated over the years, but have not yet managed to replicate the multifunctionality observed in the natural system (Niewiarowski et al. 2016). There are a number of potential explanations for this, but one could be that most gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives are simplified single fibers that do not fully replicate the multiply branched structure of gecko setae. Anoles, however, have independently evolved adhesive toe pads with fundamentally simpler microstructures compared to their gecko counterparts; anole setae are single fibers with a single, larger spatulate tip and more closely resemble the gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives that are currently capable of being generated (see slideshow for images). Therefore, anoles may be an excellent model fibrillar system to better understand the observed functional discrepancy between synthetic and natural fibrillar adhesives.
In an invited paper recently accepted for publication in Integrative and Comparative Biology, my co-authors and I (see full citation below) briefly reviewed the relevant literature concerning the anole adhesive system, discussed how investigation of this convergently evolved system could impact our general understanding of fibrillar adhesion, and suggested a number of hypotheses and areas of future inquiry that could be tackled in future work.
Anole adhesive toe pads have often been suggested as evolutionary key innovations (Losos 2011), yet they have not been nearly as well studied as gecko adhesive toe pads. Nevertheless, general morphometrics, clinging ability on smooth substrates, and correlations between adhesive toe pad size, clinging ability, and habitat use have been reported for anoles (Losos 2011). Studies, however, reporting Anolis clinging ability on ecologically-relevant surfaces, detailed morphometric data of anoline setae, and the multifunctional properties of anoline adhesive toe pads are limited or nonexistent. Anoles may be excellent models for fibrillar adhesion for four main reasons: (1) anole setae are closer in dimensions and morphology to the currently producible gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives, (2) anole setae are not multiply branched which may reduce the complexity of modeling and/or explaining adhesion especially under non-ideal circumstances, (3) anole setae also more closely resemble the theoretical models previously used to explain gecko adhesion, and (4) the extensive evolutionary and ecological data on anoles may assist in answering persisting questions regarding the adhesion ecology and evolution of adhesive pad-bearing lizards.
Although the gecko adhesive system has been particularly well-studied over the past two decades, many fundamentals of biological fibrillar adhesion still need to be worked out or are otherwise unknown. We believe that parallel investigation of the anoline fibrillar adhesive system may assist in filling these gaps in our knowledge, and thus we encourage an interdisciplinary, communal effort to investigate the adhesive ecology, evolution, morphology, performance, and behavior of anoles.
Full citation
Garner, A.M., M.C. Wilson, A.P. Russell, A. Dhinojwala, and P.H. Niewiarowski. Going Out on a Limb: How Investigation of the Anoline Adhesive System can Enhance our Understanding of Fibrillar Adhesion. Integrative and Comparative Biology. In press. Link to article.
References
Autumn K, Niewiarowski PH, Puthoff JB. 2014. Gecko Adhesion as a Model System for Integrative Biology, Interdisciplinary Science, and Bioinspired Engineering. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 45(1):445-470.
Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA, Peattie AM, Hansen WR, Sponberg S, Kenny TW, Fearing R, Israelachvili JN, Full RJ. 2002. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99(19):12252-12256.
Losos JB. 2011. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press.
Niewiarowski PH, Stark AY, Dhinojwala A. 2016. Sticking to the story: outstanding challenges in gecko-inspired adhesives. Journal of Experimental Biology 219(7):912-919.
- Anoles as Models for Dry Fibrillar Adhesion - April 12, 2019
- Clipped Claws and Consequences for Anolis Adhesive Performance - January 13, 2018
Lana Cotsonas
I was so happy to discover a green Florida anole living in my back yard. Of course I grabbed my phone to take a couple pics. I almost hit video and now I wish I had. There were several brown Cuban anoles on the fence but the green Florida ignored them as well as the ants they were feeding in and instead ate the ripe berries off of the large lantana growing against the fence. I was shocked. I have never seen an anole eat anything except insects, smaller lizards etc. Perhaps this is another adaptation!