Category: New Research Page 12 of 67

Can Evolution in Brown Anoles Keep Pace with Climate Change?

A male brown anole from the island of Great Exuma in The Bahamas.

Human-caused climate change is rapidly changing the thermal environments experienced by many species. Most ectotherms, like many of our beloved anoles, maintain small home ranges and are therefore assumed to lack the ability to disperse over long distances. If they can’t migrate to thermally suitable areas, how will anole populations deal with climate change? A major theme emerging in the literature is that evolutionary adaptation may be one of the primary ways that anoles compensate for rapid environmental change.

In close collaboration with many other people, my recent work has focused on thermal adaptation in the brown anole (Anolis sagrei) from The Bahamas. Our early findings suggested that this species may be able to rapidly adapt to changing thermal environments. For example, we found that the thermal optimum for running speed (the “thermal performance curve”) was locally adapted in populations living on a series of thermally variable cays in The Bahamas. Populations were locally adapted despite high levels of gene flow across the archipelago, suggesting that selection is constantly weeding out maladapted genotypes as they arrive and favoring individuals whose thermal biology matched local conditions. We also tested this idea experimentally by transplanting brown anoles from a cool, forested environment to a sun-baked peninsula and tracking (through mark-recapture) which individuals survived and which perished. The peninsula was much warmer and more thermally variable than the ancestral environment, and we were able to show that strong selection favored individuals with higher thermal optima and broader thermal tolerances on the peninsula. While these studies suggested that there is potential for evolutionary adaptation to future climate change, a major question was left unanswered: is there sufficient genetic variation underlying thermal traits such that populations could evolve rapidly? If a trait is not heritable, it will not evolve, and surprisingly few studies have measured the additive genetic basis of physiological traits in lizards.

To answer this question, we captured adult brown anoles from the same two populations involved in our previous transplant experiment (lizards from the islands of Eleuthera and Great Exuma in The Bahamas), brought them back to Bob Cox’s lab at the University of Virginia, and conducted a common-garden breeding experiment. First, Bob raised hundreds of offspring from these two populations, which were native to environments that differed dramatically in their thermal properties. The environment on Eleuthera was much warmer and more thermally variable than the environment on Exuma, so if genetic adaptation had occurred, the offspring of these populations should differ in their thermal physiology when raised in an identical environment, and the differences should be congruent with our previous estimates of natural selection. Interestingly, we found that these populations differed in every aspect of thermal physiology that we measured, but only some of these differences matched our predictions. For example, Eleuthera offspring had higher thermal optima for running speed (predicted to occur based on the warm environment they came from), but lower performance breadths (the opposite of what we predicted because the site on Eleuthera is more thermally variable).

Next, to understand the potential for rapid adaptation to future climate change, we used the pedigrees of the breeding colonies to estimate the additive genetic basis (i.e. heritability) of both the thermal sensitivity of running speed and several aspects of thermoregulatory behavior. For the latter, Don Miles introduced hundreds of Great Exuma individuals to a thermal gradient and measured how they behaved in the gradient. Though the results were somewhat variable, the bottom line is that we found very low heritability in most aspects of thermal physiology and thermoregulatory behavior.

The thermal sensitivity of running speed differed between brown anole populations from the cooler island of Exuma and the hotter island of Eleuthera, even when we raised hatchlings in an identical environment, suggesting that the populations have genetically diverged. Peak running speed for Eleuthera lizards occured at warmer body temperatures, and Exuma individuals ran faster at all body temperatures measured other than the lowest. This figure is copied from Logan et al. (2018).

In general, our results suggest that these populations have adapted to divergent thermal environments in the past, but lack the capacity to evolve rapidly into the future. This could be because strong selection has reduced genetic variation in thermal traits by fixing locally adapted alleles in each environment. Or in the case of the thermal performance curves, it is possible that precise thermoregulatory behavior has removed the need for alleles that confer broad thermal tolerance, leading to mutational decay of those genes. Whatever the cause, we now have evidence to suggest that some thermal traits in brown anoles lack the capacity to evolve rapidly.

There are a number of caveats that go along with our study. First, our sample sizes (Great Exuma = 289, Eleuthera = 119) are modest as quantitative genetic studies go. That fact combined with the difficulty of getting precise estimates of physiological and behavioral traits means that our study should not be considered the final word on the evolutionary potential of thermal performance curves or thermoregulatory behavior in brown anoles or any other species. Second, brown anoles are one of the most successful species on the planet. Indeed, they are extremely common in their native range and have invaded much of the Western Hemisphere. This is not a species that appears to have trouble conquering novel thermal environments, so in no way are we suggesting that they are particularly vulnerable to climate change. In fact, our data suggests that they are likely using behavioral adjustments or phenotypic plasticity to adapt to novel environments, and if anything testifies to the fact that within-generation physiological adjustments can be an extremely powerful tool for mitigating the effects of climate change. Lastly, there are a number of traits we did not measure. What about the critical thermal limits? What about the thermal sensitivity of other performance traits like digestive efficiency, endurance, and bite force? What about thermoconforming species that live deep in forests and have different thermoregulatory strategies and physiological tendencies? There is a lot of work left to be done before we know the full evolutionary potential of anoles under rapid climate change.

The work I’ve discussed here resulted from the efforts of a number of hard-working scientists, including Ryan Calsbeek, Bob Cox, Joel McGlothlin, Don Miles, Katie Duryea, John David Curlis, Anthony Gilbert, Albert Chung, Orsolya Molnar, and Benji Kessler.

Behavioral and TRPA1 Heat Sensitivities in Three Sympatric Cuban Anolis Lizards


I would like to introduce our recently published paper on Comparison of Behavioral and TRPA1 heat sensitivities in Cuban Anolis lizards. In Cuba, three sympatric species of Anolis lizards (Anolis allogus, A. homolechis, and A. sagrei) inhabit different thermal microhabitats (above). Different thermal habitats, that is shade, edges of forests and cleared forests, are occupied by A. allogus, A. homolechis and A. sagrei, respectively. Anolis allogus is non-heliothermic, while A. homolechis and A. sagrei are heliothermic species. Our previous study found that these species showed distinct gene expression patterns in response to temperature stimuli, suggesting the genetically distinct thermal physiology among species (Akashi et al. 2016. Mol.Ecol.).

For lizards, heat avoidance behavior is crucial for limiting their body temperatures within thermally safe margins. We predict that the temperature that elicits heat avoidance behavior would differ between these three Anolis species, and the differences might be related to different heat sensors among the species. Organisms perceive various temperatures via biological temperature sensors, such as thermosensitive transient receptor potential ion channels (thermo-TRPs). Among known thermo-TRPs, transient receptor potential ion channel ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in non-mammalian species has been reportedly heat sensitive (Saito et al. 2012).

In our paper, we first conducted behavioral experiments to analyze the temperatures at which the three Anolis species escape from heat source (i.e., hotplate; Fig. 1) to examine whether the Anolis species inhabiting locally distinct thermal habitats diverge their thermal tolerances.

Then, for each of the three species, we isolated cDNA encoding of TRPA1, and performed electrophysiological analysis to quantify activation temperature of Anolis TRPA1. We found that temperatures triggering behavioral and TRPA1 responses were significantly lower for the shade-dwelling, non-heliothermic species (A. allogus) than for sun-dwelling heliothermic species (A. homolechis and A. sagrei).

The ambient temperature of shade habitats where A. allogus occurs stays relatively cool compared to that of open habitats where A. homolechis and A. sagrei occur and bask. The high temperature thresholds of A. homolechis and A. sagrei may reflect their heat tolerances that would benefit these species to inhabit the open habitats.

Akashi, H., S. Saito, A. Cádiz , T. Makino, M .Tominaga, M. Kawata. (2018) Comparisons of behavioral and TRPA1 heat sensitivities in three sympatric Cuban Anolis lizards. Molecular Ecology  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14572

Anoles versus Geckos: The Ultimate Showdown

Two green lizards in Miami, one of each variety.

Two green lizards in Miami, one of each variety.

History is rich with great rivalries; David versus Goliath, Red Sox versus Yankees, Alien versus Predator, but one of the greatest match ups of our time is anole lizards versus gecko lizards. For readers of this blog that are unfamiliar, for which I assume there are few, geckos and anoles are well matched competitors because of their morphological and ecological similarities. Geckos (infraorder Gekkota) are the earliest branch on the squamate tree (sister to all other lizards and snakes) with over 1500 species around the globe, whereas anoles (genus Anolis) appeared roughly 150 million year after the origin of geckos (nested within the Iguania infraorder). The roughly 400 species of anoles can be found primarily in Central and South America. Geckos and anoles both independently evolved very similar hairy adhesive toe pads that help them adhere to and navigate vertical and inverted surfaces. While anoles can likely trace their toe pads to a single origin (and one loss in A. onca), toe pads likely arose and were lost multiple times within Gekkota, although we are still sorting out the exact details (Gamble et al., 2017). Nearly all anoles are arboreal and diurnal, with only a handful of terrestrial or rock dwelling species. Conversely, geckos can be found thriving in arboreal as well as rocky and terrestrial microhabitats day and night.

While anoles tend to get all of the attention from evolutionary ecologists, with decades of amazing research quantifying their habitat use in the Caribbean, geckos are actually older, with more ecological and morphological diversity. As my prior PhD advisor Luke Harmon can surely confirm, I have been interested in knowing how or if insights from Caribbean anole ecomorphology can be applied to geckos. How similar is the evolution and diversification of geckos and anoles? Do geckos partition their habitat along similar dimensions as Caribbean anoles?

In this post, I’d like to share some of my previous work comparing and contrasting gecko and anole diversification and habitat use and then solicit information and opinions from the anole community for an upcoming field trip in which we will be looking at habitat use of sympatric introduced geckos and anoles.

figures

Fig 1. Our reconstruction of gecko (blue) and anole (green) ancestral toe pad performance based on our best fitting weak OU model of trait evolution. Horizontal bars below the X-axis represent the region in which we constrained the origin of toe pads for each clade. Detachment angle (y-axis) represents our measure toe pad performance (the maximum ratio of adhesion and friction a species can generate). The generation of more adhesion for a given amount of friction results in a higher detachment angle. Shaded bands represent our estimated OU optimum value for each clade. Figure modified from Hagey et al. (2017b).

In 2017, we had two great papers come out investigating the diversification of toe pad adhesive performance in geckos and anoles, and the ecomorphology of Queensland geckos. In our diversification paper (Hagey et al., 2017b), we found that while geckos are an older and larger group than anoles, their toe pad performance does not appear to be evolving towards a single evolutionary optimum. Instead, we found that Brownian motion with a trend (or a very weak Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model) best modeled our data, suggesting geckos have been slowly evolving more and more diverse performance capabilities since their origin approximately 200 million years ago (Fig 1). These results assume a single evolutionary origin of Gekkota toe pads, which was supported by our ancestral state reconstructions, but ancestral state reconstructions are far from a perfect way to infer the history of a trait. And so for now, the true history of the gecko toe pad’s origin(s) remains a ‘sticky’ issue. Conversely, adhesive performance in anoles appears to be pinned to a single optima in which anoles quickly reached after their split from their padless sister group (i.e. a strong Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model, Fig 1).

Given these results and the fact that geckos are such a morphologically diverse group, living on multiple continents in many different microhabitats, our results suggest the adhesive performance of geckos may be tracking multiple optima, and when pad-bearing geckos are considered together as a single large group, could produce the general drifting pattern we observed when we assume their ancestor started without little to very poor adhesive capabilities. On the flip side, we can imagine multiple reasons why anoles appear to be limited in their toe pad performance. Perhaps anoles lack the genetic diversity to produce more variable toe pads or they are mechanically or developmentally constrained to a limited area of performance space. Alternatively, since anoles are nearly all arboreal and diurnal in new world tropical environments, it is possible that they are all succeeding in the same adaptive zone and there isn’t the evolutionary pressure or opportunity to evolve more diverse performance capabilities. Closer studies of the adhesive performance capabilities of the few anoles species that have branched out from arboreal microhabitats, such as the rock dwelling aquatic species would be really interesting!

figures2

Fig 2. Our gecko and anole residual limb length calculations suggest geckos (grey triangles) generally have shorter limbs then anoles (black circles). Figure modified from Hagey et al. (2017a).

In our second paper from 2017 (Hagey et al., 2017a), we quantified microhabitat use and limb lengths of geckos across Queensland, Australia and compared these patterns to those known from Caribbean anoles. We found some interesting differences and similarities. Our first result arose as we tried to calculate residual limb lengths and realized that geckos, as a group, have shorter limbs than anoles, which resulted in us calculating residual limb lengths for geckos and anoles separately (Fig 2). We then compared microhabitat use and limb length patterns and found that Strophurus geckos may be similar to grass-bush anoles. Both groups have long limbs for their body lengths and use narrow perches close to the ground. We also found other general similarities such as large bodied canopy dwelling crown-giant anoles and large bodied canopy dwelling Pseudothecadactylus geckos. Unfortunately, we didn’t focus on sympatric Australian geckos and so we couldn’t make direct habitat partitioning comparisons to anoles. We hope to fix that in our next project and would really love to hear from you, the anole community.

Later this spring, I am planning a fieldtrip with John Phillips and Eben Gering, both fellow researchers here at Michigan State University, to Hawai’i (Kaua’i and O’ahu) to investigate habitat partitioning of invasive geckos and anoles, specifically A. carolinensis, A. sagrei, and Phelsuma laticauda. Jonathan Losos one claimed that Phelsuma are honorary anoles! These three species are all diurnal, arboreal, have adhesive toe pads, and are commonly seen in Hawai’i and so we expect them to be competing for perch space. This has been on some of the greatest anole minds since at least 2011 with Jonathan wondering which group would win when the two clades collide in the Pacific. Previous studies of anole ecomorphs across the Greater Antilles and invasive A. sageri in the southeastern US give us a good expectation of how the trunk-crown A. carolinensis and the trunk dwelling A. sagrei should interact and partition their arboreal microhabitat, with A. sagrei pushing A. carolinensis up the trunk. The wild card is P. laticauda. There hasn’t been much microhabitat use work done with Malagasy geckos, and definitely nothing compared to the extensive work with Caribbean anoles. As a result, I don’t know much about exactly what part of the arboreal environment P. laticauda uses in its natural range or how it will fit in with its new pad-bearing brethren in Hawai’i. The best information we have to my knowledge is a study of other arboreal Phelsuma by Luke Harmon in Mauritius (Harmon et al., 2007). He found that while the Phelsuma geckos of Mauritius also partition their arboreal habitat by perch height and somewhat by diameter, they also partition by palm-like or non-palm-like perches. I’m not aware of any anole observations suggesting a palm/non-palm axis of partitioning and so this may be a novel axis that P. laticauda is using in Hawai’i to live in amongst the anoles.

Anoles, geckos, and Hawai’i have come up repeatedly here on Anole Annals

Reproductive Biology of Introduced Green Anoles in Hawaii

JMIH 2016: Anolis vs. Phelsuma in Hawaii

Amazing Green Anole Battle In Hawaii

More On Anoles And Day Geckos In Hawaii

Anoles And Banana Flowers In Hawaii

Fighting Hawaiian Anoles

Brown Anoles on Hawaii and Battle of the Intercontinental Convergents

Many Hawaiians Don’t Like Brown Anoles

SICB 2018: Unraveling Natural and Human-Mediated Founder Events in Anolis carolinensis

Factors Restricting Range Expansion for the Invasive Green Anole Anolis carolinensis on Okinawa Island, Japan

Anole Watercolor Available on Etsy

A Failed Anole Predation Attempt

This Is Not A Madagascan Day Gecko

Battle of the Diurnal, Arboreal Exotics in Florida (the Anole Loses)

Strange perch mate

Green Anole Mayhem

and so we know folks have been thinking about these species and specifically this invasive set of species for a while. We are especially excited to see Amber Wright’s research suggesting P. laticauda was perching above A. carolinensis in her enclosures. We want to know what the anole community has to say. We also don’t want to duplicate or intrude on any projects that are already under way.. If this is something you’ve already started, or started to wonder about… let us know! We would love to collaborate, partitioning interesting questions, if there are already labs working in this arena. We would also be grateful for suggestions, field site recommendations, or relevant publications we may have missed.

 

Invasive Lizard Meets Native Lizard: the Cartoon!

1_english

Our article was recently published in BJLS (Dufour, Herrel and Losos 2017)!

For the occasion, I made this short comic to pique your curiosity!

Will Chris’ (Anolis cristatellus) and Z’Andy (Anolis oculatus) endure the pressure of a new cohabitation?

Find out more here: https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-abstract/123/1/43/4627047

Ecological character displacement between a native and an introduced species: the invasion of Anolis cristatellus in Dominica.

1_english 2_english3_english 4_english 5_english

 

A Clouded Anole Male during a nocturnal walk through the jungle

The Lonely Clouded Anole on a Pacific Island

Anolis nebulosus

Anolis nebulosus. Photo by Hugo Siliceo-Cantero.

By H. Hugo Siliceo-Cantero and A. Garcia

In the late 1980´s, the scientists Bradford C. Lister and Andrés García discovered an interesting population of clouded anoles inhabiting the small 3.3 ha island of San Agustin located just off the Pacific coast of Jalisco, Mexico. This island was also close to the actual protected area of tropical dry forest on the mainland in the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve. Lister and García reported that the abundant anole population on San Agustin was maintained a decade later at much higher densities than the mainland population. We began to study this population in 2007 as a graduate student. Since then, we have studied several aspects of the ecology of this island population comparing this with the ecology of anoles on the mainland.

The existence of such island populations enables scientists to carry out natural experiments that provide invaluable information helping us to understand ecological and evolutionary processes.

This Clouded Anole (Anolis nebulosus) species that is on San Agustin Island is endemic to Mexico, and is of particular interest as this population has evolved in the absence of similar species of the same genus, or congeners. The species on the island also occupies a broad niche of perch height and a low number of lamellae, and is one of the most sedentary anoles known. Our work demonstrated that San Agustin population of the Clouded Anole has distinct morphological and genetic traits compared to conspecifics on the mainland.

Recently, we found that the insular population also presents distinct ecologic traits compared to those of the mainland population. In our manuscript “Assessing the relative importance of intra- and interspecific interactions on the ecology of Anolis nebulosus lizards from an island vs. a mainland population”, we suggest that the processes that drives the ecology and evolution of this insular population (intraspecific competition) differs from those that are important in the mainland (interspecific competition).

We believe that the results of our research on the insular population of anoles on San Agustin Island complement the scenario of Caribbean anoles, where congeneric competition is the key evolutionary driver. Furthermore, in our study, we used video cameras to provide direct evidence of predation, interspecific and intraspecific encounters and aggression, which was possible because the Clouded Anole is a sedentary lizard.

It has been a pleasant and rewarding experience for me to study the Clouded Anole. Although spending hours in the field observing a largely sedentary lizard may seem a little boring and tedious, the data from our studies have revealed a fascinating adaptation to the natural and social environment with unique physical, genetic, and ecological characteristics.

Currently, the population of Clouded Anoles on San Agustin has been dramatically reduced, almost to the point of extirpation. We think that two natural events, the hurricanes Jova in 2011 and Patricia in 2015, as well as invasive studies such as Hernández-Salinas et al. (2016) where they extracted 77 anoles from this small island, are the cause of the dramatic reduction in the Clouded Anole of San Agustin Island. As ecologists, we believe that research should not be done at the expense of the species or population under study, but should ensure that the population remains intact to continue along its evolutionary path, and further elucidate our understanding of the natural world around us.

We are currently monitoring both insular and mainland populations in order to understand and evidence the ecological implications of such natural and anthropogenic reduction on anole populations.

Clipped Claws and Consequences for Anolis Adhesive Performance

Figure 1. Differences in claw clipping used in Bloch and Irschick (2005) and our study. (A) The entire claw was clipped after the distal end of the toe pad. (B) In our study, we partially clipped the distalmost portion of the claw.

Figure 1. Differences in claw clipping used in Bloch and Irschick (2005) and our study. (A) Bloch and Irschick (2005) clipped the entire claw after the distal end of the toe pad. (B) In our study, we partially clipped the distalmost portion of the claw.

Toe and claw clipping are common techniques used to identify individuals in mark and recapture studies, but their impacts on whole organism performance are unclear (Dunham et al., 1988). Anoles have not only developed subdigital adhesive toe pads to promote adhesion on relatively smooth substrates, but have also retained claws to enhance attachment to rough substrates (Irschick et al., 1996; Zani, 2000). Thus, clipping entire toes or claws may have drastic effects on the clinging ability of anoles or other adhesive pad-bearing lizards. In our recent article published in Acta Herpetologica, my co-authors and I investigated how partially removing the claws of brown anoles affects their adhesive performance.

Figure 2. Mean maximum clinging force of Anolis sagrei with intact and partially clipped claws. Overall, partial claw clipping had no significant effect on maximum clinging ability.

Figure 2. Mean maximum clinging force of Anolis sagrei with intact and partially clipped claws. Overall, partial claw clipping had no significant effect on maximum clinging ability.

Bloch and Irschick (2005) removed entire claws from Anolis carolinensis (Fig. 1A) and measured its impact on their clinging ability. Not surprisingly, claw removal resulted in a significant decrease in the clinging ability of A. carolinensis, likely a consequence of the severing of flexor tendons that are critical in adhesive toe pad engagement. In an effort to test this hypothesis and preserve these tendons, we used a motorized force sensor (Niewiarowski et al., 2008) to measure the maximum clinging ability of 19 Anolis sagrei before and after their claws were partially clipped (Fig. 1B).

Overall, we found that partial claw clipping did not significantly impact maximum clinging ability (Figure 2). This suggests that clipping the entire claws of anoles may indeed sever the flexor tendons crucial to toe pad engagement. Furthermore, we expected clinging ability to increase after partial claw clipping because claws should theoretically interfere with the contact the subdigital adhesive pads are capable of producing. However, this did not appear to be the case, suggesting that claws may not inhibit the engagement of subdigital pads or that morphological features and/or behavioral traits reduce the effect of this interaction.

Anolis sagrei

Anolis sagrei

Although permanent marking solutions would be most beneficial for mark and recapture studies, partial claw clipping may be a useful alternative for shorter-term studies because it does not appear to reduce adhesive performance on smooth substrates. Future work should further consider the interactions between subdigital adhesive toe pads and claws, and determine the possible ramifications for adhesion and adhesive locomotion, particularly on rough substrates. Be sure to check out our full article for more details!

References

Bloch, N., Irschick, D.J. (2005): Toe-clipping dramatically reduces clinging performance in a pad-bearing lizard (Anolis carolinensis). J. Herpetol. 39: 288-293.

Dunham, A.E., Morin, P.J., Wilbur, H.M. (1988): Methods for the study of reptile populations. In: Biology of the Reptilia, pp. 331-386. Gans, C. Huey, R.B., Eds, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York.

Irschick, D.J., Austin, C.C., Petren, K., Fisher, R.N., Losos, J.B., Ellers, O. (1996): A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad-bearing lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 21-35.

Niewiarowski, P.H., Lopez, S., Ge, L., Hagan, E., Dhinojwala, A. (2008): Sticky gecko feet: the role of temperature and humidity. PLoS ONE 3: e2192.

Zani, P. (2000): The comparative evolution of lizard claw and toe morphology and clinging performance. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 316-325.

 

SICB 2018: When the Lights Go Up in the City

Chris Thawley at a crossroads.

Chris Thawley at a crossroads.

Plants and animals across the globe are dealing with increasingly changing environments resulting from urbanization. One such habitat alteration is artificial light at night (ALAN) that may affect how animals acquire or use energy. Because brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) are common invaders of urban habitats, they make good models to examine the consequences associated with ALAN. Thus, Chris Thawley of Jason Kolbe’s lab at University of Rhode Island altered the level of ALAN on female brown anoles to examine how ALAN might affect morphology, reproduction, and stress.

If this sounds familiar, Chris talked about this work at the 2017 JMIH meeting, which caught Anole Annals press. To recap, Chris found that ALAN increased female growth, advanced the start of egg laying to earlier in the season, and increased the reproductive output of smaller females. However, he hypothesized that such beneficial effects would be countered by negative effects on other traits. Thus, Chris measured levels of the stress hormone corticosterone in the blood of females, hypothesizing that those exposed to ALAN would have higher stress. Although marginally non-significant, females actually tended to have lower corticosterone levels. Chris presented new data for this presentation showing that male corticosterone levels were unaffected by ALAN too, suggesting neither adult male nor female brown anoles have a stress response to artificial light.

Thus, it appears ALAN exposure over this 7-week study was beneficial for brown anole reproduction. However, Chris cautioned that there may be negative consequences on other traits such as immunity or HPA function. ALAN might also induce negative consequences for reproduction later in life, such as a reduced lifespan. I recommend keeping an eye on the Kolbe lab to find out!

SICB 2018: Moms Help Embryos Beat the Heat

Putter, Austin, and a real big tree they visited while travelling to the meeting.

Putter, Austin, and a real big tree they visited while travelling to the meeting.

The effect of urbanization on animals was the topic of many presentations at this year’s SICB meeting. One difference in the abiotic environment of urban areas is that they are often hotter than neighboring natural areas. Sarin “Putter” Tiatragul and colleagues (Josh Hall, Nathaniel Palik, and Dan Warner) at Auburn University are interested in whether urban environments might influence the nesting ecology and development of anoles. Thus, they set to the field to search for nest sites of the Puerto Rican Crested Anole (Anolis cristatellus).

Putter predicted females would choose warm, open-canopied nest sites at both urban and forested habitats, but that the availability of such locations would not be equal between sites. As predicted, randomly available areas in urban habitat had less tree cover and were warmer than randomly available locations in the forest. In the forest, females nested in locations that were similar to what was randomly available (no preference) in terms of distance to the nearest tree, canopy cover, and nest temperature. However, urban anoles nested in less open areas and closer to trees than what was randomly available in the urban habitat. This resulted in female-chosen nests sites being cooler than what was randomly available.

These findings suggest female anoles in forested areas are not choosing nest sites, probably because the forested habitat is homogenous and provides little variation to choose amongst. However, females in urban areas search out cooler microhabitats possibly to achieve favorable incubation conditions for their offspring. Putter also suggested these females may be simply nesting close to where they normally occur, which is close to trees. Either way, females are using the habitat differently in urban areas and such variation will likely have consequences for offspring during development.

SICB 2018: Revisiting the Fitch-Hillis Hypothesis in Mexican Anoles

A small sample of anole dewlap diversity. Image from Nicholson et al. (2007).

A small sample of anole dewlap diversity. Image from Nicholson et al. (2007).

Dewlaps are pretty dazzling, ranging in size, coloration, and sexual dimorphism substantially among the 400+ species of anole currently recognized. Levi Gray, a doctoral candidate at the University of New Mexico is fascinated by Anolis dewlaps, and has spent many years studying them. One of the classic hypotheses surrounding dewlap evolution in anoles is that its size follows a clinal pattern with environment (Fitch and Hillis 1984). In their formulation, Henry Fitch and David Hillis proposed that, due to a relatively short breeding season, anoles in more seasonal habitats have larger dewlaps than anoles in more aseasonal habitats. This hypothesis makes an explicit connection between the intensity of sexual selection and the size of a conspicuous ornament.

Levi set out to test the Fitch-Hillis hypothesis in 40 species of Mexican anoles distributed across environmental gradients, with some species found in aseaonal cloud forests and rainforests and others found in more seasonally dry habitats. Contrary to the Fitch-Hillis hypothesis, he found no relationship between seasonality and dewlap size in the Mexican anoles. He did detect a few clade effects: for example, a group of closely related western Mexican anoles all have large dewlaps. He then examined the Fitch-Hillis hypothesis within a single widespread species of anole, A. sericeus, to see if the pattern holds up within species, even if it doesn’t hold up among species. Again, he didn’t detect a pattern. Levi suspects that the relatively limited sampling of the original study might have led to a pattern that doesn’t hold up when a broader sampling within and among species is employed. It is possible that seasonality impacts a different aspect of the dewlap, such as coloration, but this remains untested. Levi’s results suggest that the processes impacting dewlap size might be complex, and promises more to come. Stay tuned!

Levi Gray presents his research on dewlap size evolution in Mexican anoles at SICB 2018 in San Francisco.

Levi Gray presents his research on dewlap size evolution in Mexican anoles at SICB 2018 in San Francisco.

SICB 2018 – Are Anoles Adapting to Hot City Environments?

Urbanization, the creation and spread of urban habitats, is increasing across the world. Species that live in these urban habitats are subject to many alterations in their environment, including changes in food, predators, noise, and light among others. One of the most well-known changes associated with cities is the “Urban Heat Island” effect, where city habitats are hotter than surrounding areas due to increases in pavement and other heat-absorbing materials. For lizards such as anoles, living in this hotter environment could be challenging, as increased heat could reduce time available for foraging for food or defending territories, or, in more serious cases, might even lead to death. Shane Campbell-Staton, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Illinois and the University of Montana, decided to test if anoles were adapting to these hot urban environments, and, if so, what mechanisms were driving this adaptation.

Credit: http://www.ecology.com/2013/07/01/summertime-hot-time-in-the-city/

Cities are hotter than the surrounding landscape.

Shane worked with crested anoles (Anolis cristatellus) from four different areas of Puerto Rico that had both urban and nearby natural environments. He and Kristin Winchell, his coauthor, verified that anoles in these urban habitats did indeed experience hotter conditions, and that, as a result, their body temperatures were also higher than anoles from nearby natural areas. In the lab, Shane found that these city anoles were capable of tolerating higher temperatures than their counterparts from natural areas as well. However, after 8 weeks in the lab, anoles from both types of habitats had similar temperature tolerances. Shane also raised offspring from these anoles under common conditions in the lab and found that these offspring had similar temperature tolerances (thermal limits), regardless of whether they came from urban or natural environments. These results show that anoles can have a plastic response to the thermal conditions in their environment, meaning that the differences Shane and Kristin saw in Puerto Rico are induced by an anole’s exposure to temperatures and are not completely determined by their genes.

Crested anoles (Anolis cristatellus) make use of many human-altered habitats.

Crested anoles (Anolis cristatellus) make use of many human-altered habitats. Photo by Andrew Battles.

Shane, however, continued to explore this question: he wanted to know if the ability, or plasticity, of an anole to alter its thermal tolerance in response to exposure to high urban temperatures was due to changes in its genetic structure. In essence, he wanted to know if anoles had evolved a higher responsiveness (or plasticity) in response to inhabiting hotter, city habitats. To get at this, Shane exposed anoles to both hot and normal temperatures in the lab and looked at their levels of gene expression. Using a transcriptomics approach, Shane could see which genes were activated differently when lizards were exposed to temperatures indicative of city and natural habitats. Shane observed differences in variation in the genes in use at these temperatures. He also found higher levels of differentiation between genes involved in thermal adaptation between lizards from city and natural environments. These exciting results show that living in hotter city environments has selected for lizards which are more able to respond to these hot temperatures when they experience them. Shane is continuing to dig deeper into these data to determine which specific genes may have been altered to understand the mechanisms by which lizards are able to alter their heat tolerances. We’re looking forward to seeing these results at a future conference!

On a side note, Shane will be setting up his own lab at UCLA this year, and he’ll be looking for talented graduate students interested in physiology, adaptation, and genomics. Don’t hesitate to look him up!

Page 12 of 67

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén