Author: Wendy Jesse

PhD Candidate at the Department of Ecological Science at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. I'm working towards constructing a predictive framework of island invasibility in the Anthropocene by studying a wide variety of natural and anthropogenic factors that influence the biogeography of herpetofauna in the (Dutch) Caribbean.

Spot the Differences: Native vs. Exotic Anoles

Recently, the book Invasion Genetics: the Baker & Stebbins legacy was published online, covering various aspects of the evolutionary biology of invasive plant, animal, fungus and microbe species. One chapter, coauthored by myself, will particularly appeal to Anole Annals readers, as it provides an extensive review of the genetic, evolutionary and ecological differences between exotic and native anole species. Anoles are highly appropriate for a book on invasion genetics, because of the large body of research on both the genotype and phenotype of anoles, the many species that have exhibited the ability to establish populations outside of their native range, and the exponentially increasing number of exotic anole populations since the onset and intensification of travel and trade in the Caribbean and across the world.

The chapter contrasts what is known about the natural dispersal and colonization processes of Caribbean native anoles to the human‐mediated translocation of exotic anoles in the Anthropocene. Previously, natural colonization events rarely occurred, whereas the rate of new (exotic) anole colonizations has increased drastically. The main argument of the chapter is that the many exotic introductions have eroded the previously strong biogeographic structure of anole assemblages.

Exotic Anolis cristatellus on St. Martin

An exotic crested anole male (Anolis cristatellus) on the island of St. Martin. (photographer: Wendy Jesse)

First Ever Recorded Introduction of Endemic Saban Anole (Anolis sabanus)

by: Wendy Jesse and Hannah Madden

The Lesser Antillean island of Saba (Caribbean Netherlands) harbors a unique anole species, Anolis sabanus, of which the males are easily distinguishable by their striking skin pattern. This endemic species is the only anole species found on the island, but is abundant within its native range of only 13 km2. Last April, a male individual was found outside of Saba on the neighboring island of St. Eustatius (Caribbean Netherlands) marking the first ever recorded exotic introduction of Anolis sabanus.

Anolis sabanus

Anolis sabanus (Saban anole). Source: The Reptile Database.

Do Communities of Introduced Anoles Differ from Natural Communities?

Anolis cristatellus awakened on a leaf. Photo credit: Tom Kennedy, University of New Mexico.

Anolis cristatellus, native to Puerto Rico but introduced to a number of areas, awakened on a leaf. Photo credit: Tom Kennedy, University of New Mexico.

Human-mediated species invasions are excellent real-time experiments to assess community assembly. These recent invasions are considered accurate analogues of ancient colonizations, which contribute to today’s natural species communities. Whether this is a correct assumption, however, had until now not been sufficiently tested.

A new paper by Steven Poe available online in the American Naturalist examines this point. His results are very exciting for many people working on anoles, and everyone interested in species invasions and community assembly. Therefore, I present a summary of his findings here.

Previous studies have shown that recently naturalized species are morphologically similar to ancient colonizers, indicating that processes shaping biotic communities could be the same in both situations. However, the unnatural (i.e., human-mediated) mode of dispersal responsible for assembling modern communities and the frequent establishment of animals in urban areas may result in unique species combinations that are not normally present in nature. Poe examined this proposition by comparing natural and nonnative two-species communities of anoles based on morphology and phylogenetic structure.

The results show that the morphological differences among the species in natural communities are not significantly lower or higher than those in naturalized species pairs. Furthermore, the anole species in natural and nonnative communities are morphologically indistinguishable; they have unusually high colonization scores and all morphological trait comparisons of species from naturalized communities versus natural communities are nonsignificant.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén