Green Anoles Banned In Japan

We’ve had a lot of discussion on AA about invasive anoles. Although some in Hawaii seem hot and bothered about them, only in two places–both in Asia–are governmental entities actually trying to do something about it. And, unfortunately, both such efforts seem to be having a devastating effect on the native fauna. Gerrut Norval has reported on such efforts in Taiwan and how they are leading to the massacre of many native agamid lizards. Now, thanks to sharp-eyed AA reader, anole researcher and—as a fallback career option–ichthyologist, Bruce Collette, we learn of anole control efforts on the Japanese island of Okinawajima.

The current issue of Biological Magazine of Okinawa has just published a paper by Ishikawa et al. on efforts to control introduced A. carolinensis by trapping them in glue traps. Unfortunately, as they note, this trapping has succeeded in capturing–and presumably killing–many times more native geckos than green anoles. The journal is in Japanese and if any of our Japanese readers could provide a synopsis, we’d be very appreciative. However, the abstract is in English and is appended below, along with a photo from the paper of sticky-trapped anoles.

About Jonathan Losos

Professor and Curator of Herpetology at the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University. I've spent my entire professional career studying anoles and have discovered that the more I learn about anoles, the more I realize I don't know.

7 thoughts on “Green Anoles Banned In Japan

  1. Hmmm.. The way that this abstract is written worries me. They don’t seem too concerned that they’re catching native species more than they’re catching A. carolinensis. The way it’s written seems to accept that a low catch ratio just kind of comes with the territory. Can someone who speaks Japanese see if they recommend the continued use of this method or if elsewhere in the text they recommend against it?

    1. Sad as it is to see (even exotic) green anoles perish under such inhumane & undignified circumstances, some collateral damage to native fauna might be necessary (and acceptable) to control the spread of non-natives. Gekko hokouensis is a widely distributed species of lowest conservation concern. (Of course, we can’t dismiss the possibility that geckos from Okinawajima Island are evolutionary distinct from nominally conspecific populations in Taiwan, Japan, and mainland China.)

    2. I’m not necessarily bothered by the non-partisan language. It may be that the scientists conducting the study are supposed to be agnostic on the method and not come down on one side or the other. They may just be providing the hard data for consideration by the governmental agencies in charge of green anole extermination.

    3. I asked a Japanese colleague to check, and he actually confirmed that the researchers stated that if the traps continue to collect too many non-target species, they will reduce the number of traps in that locality or even discontinue using them. The particular section is highlighted in the attached file.

      1. Thanks for looking into this Gerrut! And thanks to your colleague for translating. I am skeptical of the idea that extirpation efforts, even when warranted, would be effective. And so I am relieved, and not really surprised, to see that they are wary of this procedure. It would be a shame to take a toll on native herps, even if they are considered abundant.

  2. Can anyone get me the whole article? I have Japanese colleagues and some students who study Japanese, who will be able to translate it for us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)